A Deft Move
Just wanted to post something here in the City of Pines before I head on home tomorrow.
I just want to give a quick hat tip to the Department of Tourism for its deft move in hiring HappySlip to tour the Philippines and record some footage to promote tourism here.
Even with recent setbacks related to our air transportation, that seems like a small, insignificant step. But reaching out to Fil-Ams to go back and trace their roots here is a small investment (in an all-expenses paid trip to HappySlip, Josh Verdes and company) will surely pay big dividends in the end.
That move will give a big bang for the proverbial buck. It's creative thinking for the least amount of resources at its best.
I have to call a spade a spade. It was a very good move.
I just want to give a quick hat tip to the Department of Tourism for its deft move in hiring HappySlip to tour the Philippines and record some footage to promote tourism here.
Even with recent setbacks related to our air transportation, that seems like a small, insignificant step. But reaching out to Fil-Ams to go back and trace their roots here is a small investment (in an all-expenses paid trip to HappySlip, Josh Verdes and company) will surely pay big dividends in the end.
That move will give a big bang for the proverbial buck. It's creative thinking for the least amount of resources at its best.
I have to call a spade a spade. It was a very good move.
transcription by Punzi @ 7:16 PM
2 Objection(s):
Have you ever heard of something called the Right to Privacy in life, liberty or security?
Does such a substantive sounding right exist in form and substance anywhere in the Constitution?
If so where?
I am concerned because it is precisely the Right that the so called Rule on the Writ of Habeas Data apparently seeks to protect from violation or threat.
Both amparo and habeas data are Constitutional rights that exist in foreign Constitutions, but not ours.
How did the supreme court manage to smuggle them in via mere rules of procedures.
Have they not triply violated the prohibition on “decreasing, increasing or modifying substantive rights” if they managed to establish Constitutional rights recognized in Mexico but not here??
Good questions, Dean.
Let me get back to you on these.
regards
Post a Comment
<< Home